By Dr. Ulisse Di Corpo and Dr. Antonella Vannini (Return to Table of Contents)
The term Syntropy combines the Greek words syn (converging) and tropos (tendency) and is used to describe the anti-entropic properties of the backward-in-time solution of the fundamental equations which combine quantum mechanics with special relativity. These equations suggest that there are two tendencies: a diverging forward-in-time tendency governed by the law of entropy and a converging backward-in-time tendency governed by the law of syntropy and retrocausality. The law of syntropy provides a definition of Life Energy which is compatible with the Orgone of Wilhelm Reich, with the Omega Point of Pierre Theilhard de Chardin, with the life energy of Samuel Hahnemann, with Hans Driesch’s entelechy and offers the possibility to translate these hypotheses in testable experiments based on clear assumptions. Syntropy implies the shift towards a new supercausal paradigm which has incredible implications.
The implications of the law of syntropy are well described by Fantappiè in this letter to a friend:
“In the days just before Christmas 1941, as a consequence of conversations with two colleagues, a physicist and a biologist, I was suddenly projected in a new panorama, which radically changed the vision of science and of the Universe which I had inherited from my teachers, and which I had always considered the strong and certain ground on which to base my scientific investigations. Suddenly I saw the possibility of interpreting a wide range of solutions (the anticipated potentials) of the wave equation which can be considered the fundamental law of the Universe. These solutions had been always rejected as “impossible”, but suddenly they appeared “possible”, and they explained a new category of phenomena which I later named “syntropic”, totally different from the entropic ones, of the mechanical, physical and chemical laws, which obey only the principle of classical causation and the law of entropy.
Syntropic phenomena, which are instead represented by those strange solutions of the “anticipated potentials”, should obey two opposite principles of finality (moved by a final cause placed in the future, and not by a cause which is placed in the past) and differentiation, and also non-causable in a laboratory. This last characteristic explains why this type of phenomena has never been reproduced in a laboratory, and its finalistic properties justified the refusal among scientists, who accepted without any doubt the assumption that finalism is a “metaphysical” principle, outside Science and Nature.
This assumption obstructed the way to a calm investigation of the real existence of this second type of phenomena; an investigation which I accepted to carry out, even though I felt as if I were falling in an abyss, with incredible consequences and conclusions. It suddenly seemed as if the sky were falling apart, or at least the certainties on which mechanical science had based its assumptions. It appeared to me clear that these “syntropic”, finalistic phenomena which lead to differentiation and could not be reproduced in a laboratory, were real, and existed in nature, as I could recognize them in the living systems. The properties of this new law, opened consequences which were just incredible and which could deeply change the biological, medical, psychological, and social sciences.”
For more information contact Dr. Vannini: antonella.vannini@syntropy.org, or
Dr. diCorpo: ulisse.dicorpo@syntropy.org